Integrating Azure AD and AWS – Part 3

Posted on December 10, 2017 by mattfeltonma

Update: In November 2019 AWS introduced support for integration between Azure AD and AWS SSO. The integration offers a ton more features, including out of the box support for multiple AWS accounts. I highly recommend you go that route if you’re looking to integrate the two platforms. Check out my series on the new integration here.

Welcome! This entry continues my series in the integration of Azure AD and AWS. In my first entry I covered what the advantages of the integration are. In the second entry I walked through my lab configuration and went over what happens behind the scenes when an application is added to Azure AD from the application gallery. In this post I’m going to walk through some of the configuration we need to do in both Azure AD and AWS. I’ll also be breaking open the Azure AD and AWS metadata and examining the default assertion sent by Microsoft out of the box.

In my last entry I added the AWS application to my Azure AD tenant from the Azure AD Application Gallery. The application is now shown as added in the All Applications view of the Azure Active Directory blade for my tenant.

After selecting AWS from the listing of applications I’m presented with a variety of configuration options. Starting with Properties we’re provided with some general information and configuration options. We need to ensure that the application is enabled for users to sign-in and that it’s visible to users so we can select it from the access panel later on. Notice also that that I’m configuring the application to require the user be assigned to the application.

On the Users and groups page I’ve assigned Rick Sanchez to the application to allow the account access and display it on the access panel.

After waiting about 10 minutes (there is a delay in the time it takes for the application to appear in the application panel) I log into the Access Panel as Rick Sanchez and we can see that the AWS app has been added for Rick Sanchez.

Back to the properties page of the AWS application, my next stop is the Single sign-on page. Here I drop down the Single Sign-on Mode drop box and select SAML-based Sign-on option. Changing the mode to SAML-based Sign-on exposes a ton of options. The first option that caught my eye was the Amazon Web Services (AWS) Domain and URLs. Take notice of the note that says Amazon Web Services (AWS) is pre-integrated with Azure AD and requires no mandatory URL settings. Yeah, not exactly true as we progress through this series.

Further down we see the section that allows us to configure the unique user identifier and additional attributes. By default Microsoft includes the name, givenName, surName, and emailAddress claims. I’ll need to make some changes there to pass the claims Amazon requires, but let’s hold off on that for now.

Next up a copy of the Azure AD metadata (IdP metadata) is provided for download. Additionally some advanced options are available which provide the capability to sign the SAML response, assertion, or both as well as switching the hash algorithm between SHA1 and SHA256.

Now like any nerd, I want to poke around the IdP metadata and see what the certificate Azure AD is using to sign looks like. Opening up the metadata in a web browser parses the XML and makes the format look pretty. From there I grab the contents X509Certificate tag (the base-64 encoded public-key certificate), dump it to Notepad, and renam it with a file extension of cer. Low and behold, what do we see but a self-signed certificate. This is a case where I can see the logic that the operational overhead is far greater than the potential security risk. I mean really, does anyone want to deal with the challenge of hundreds of thousands of customers not understanding the basics of public key infrastructure and worrying about revocation, trust chains, and the like? You get a pass Microsoft… This time anyway.

Before I proceed with the next step in the configuration, let’s take a look at what the assertion looks like without any of the necessary configuration. For this I’ll use Fiddler to act as a man-in-the-middle between the client and the web. In session 6 of the screenshot below we see that the SAML response was returned to the web browser from Azure.

Next up we extract that information with the Text Wizard, base-64 decode it, copy it to Notepad, save it as an XML file, and open it with IE. The attributes containing values of interest are as follows:

Destination – The destination is the service provider assertion consumer URI

NameID – This is the unique identifier of the used by the service provider to identify the user accessing the service

Recipient– The recipient attribute references the service the assertion is intended for. Oasis security best practices for SAML require the service provider to verify this attribute match the URI for the service provider assertion consumer URI

Audience – The audience attribute in the audienceRestriction section mitigates the threat of the assertion being stolen and used to impersonate a user. Oasis security best practices require the service provider to verify this when the assertion is received to ensure it is recognizes the identifier. The way in which this is accomplished is the value in the audience attribute is checked against the service provider EntityID attribute.

Additionally we have some interesting claims including tenantid, objectidentifier of the user object in Azure AD, name, surname, givenname, displayname, identityprovider, and authnmethosreferences. I don’t think any of these need further explanation.

Let’s now take a look at the AWS (service provider in SAML terms) metadata. The AWS metadata is available for download from here. After it’s downloaded it can be opened with IE.

The fields of interest in this set of metadata is:

EntityID – The entityID is the unique identifier AWS will provide in its authentication requests. Let’s note the value of urn:amazon:webservices for later as it will come in handy due to some issues with Microsoft’s default settings.

NameIDFormat – This tells me both transient and persistent are accepted. I won’t go into details on Name ID format, you can review that for yourself in the Oasis standard. Suffice to say the Name ID format required by the service provider can throw some wrenches into integrations when using a more basic security token service (STS) like AD FS.

AssertionConsumerService – This is where our browser will post back the SAML assertion after a successful authentication. Note the URI in the location field.

RequestedAttributes – This provides us with a listing of all the attributes AWS will accept in an assertion. Note that the only two required attributes are Role and RoleSessionName.

We’ve added the AWS application to Azure AD, granted a user access to the application, and have started the SAML setup within Azure AD (Identity Provider). Let’s continue that setup by configuring which attributes Azure AD will include in the assertions delivered to AWS. From review of the AWS metadata we know that we need to send claims of Role and RoleSessionName. The RoleE will match to an an AWS IAM Role handling authorization of what we can do within AWS and the RoleSessionName provides a unique identifier for the user asserting the entitlement.

Back in the Azure AD Portal I’m going to click the option to View and edit all other user attributes. The exposes the attributes Microsoft sends by default. These include givenName, suName, emailAddress, and name. Since the AWS metadata only requires RoleSessionName and Role, I’m going to delete the other attributes. No sense in exposing additional information that isn’t needed!

After the extra attributes are deleted I create the two required attributes as seen in the screenshot below.

I’m now going to bounce over to the AWS Management Console. After logging in I navigate to the Services menu and choose IAM.

On the IAM menu I choose the Identity providers menu item and hit the Create Provider button.

On the next screen I’m required to configure the identity provider settings. I choose SAML from the drop-down box enter a provider name of MAAD and upload the IdP metadata I downloaded from Azure AD referenced earlier in the blog entry and hit the Next Step button.

On the next page I verify the provider name and the type of identity provider and hit the Create button. Once that is complete I see the new entry listed in identity providers list. Easy right?

We have an identity provider, but that identity provider needs some IAM roles to be associated with the identity provider that my fictional users can assert. For that I go to the Roles section and hit the Create Role button.

On the next screen I select the SAML button as the type of trusted entity since the role is going to be asserted via the SAML trust with Azure AD. Here I select the MAAD provider and choose the option to allow the users to access both the AWS Management Console and the API and then hit the Next: Permissions button.

As I referenced in my first entry to this series, the role I’m going to create is going to be capable of managing all EC2 instances. For that I choose the AmazonEC2FullAccess policy template and then hit the Next:Review button.

On the last screen I name the new role AzureADEC2Admins, write a short description, and hit the Create Role button.

The new role is created and can be seen associated to the identity provider representing the trust between AWS and Azure AD.

Let’s sum up what we did for this entry. We examined the key settings Microsoft exposes for configuration with the AWS integration. We examined the Azure AD (IdP) and AWS (SP) metadata to understand which settings are important to this integration and what those settings do. We examined an assertion generated out of Azure AD prior to any of the necessary customization being completed to understand what a canned assertion looks like. Finally, we completed a majority of the tasks we need to complete on the AWS side to create the SAML trust on the AWS end and to create a role JoG users can asserts. Are your eyes bleeding yet?

In my last post in this series I’ll walk through the rest of the configuration needed on the Azure AD end. This will include going over some of the mistakes the Microsoft tutorial makes as well as covering configuration of Azure AD’s provisioning integration as to what it means and how we can effectively configure it. Finally, we’ll put all the pieces of the puzzle together, assert our identity, and review logs at AWS to see what they look like when a federated user performs actions in AWS.

The journey continues in my fourth entry.

Integrating Azure AD and AWS – Part 2

Posted on December 5, 2017 by mattfeltonma

Today I will continue the journey into the integration between Azure AD and Amazon Web Services. In my first entry I covered the reasons why you’d want to integrate Azure AD with AWS and provided a high-level overview of how the solution works. The remaining entries in this series will cover the steps involved in completing the integration including deep dives into the inner workings of the solution.

Let me start out by talking about the testing environment I’ll be using for this series.

The environment includes three virtual machines (VMs) running on Windows Server 2016 Hyper V on a server at my house. The virtual machines consists three servers running Windows Server 2016 with one server acting as a domain controller for the journeyofthegeek.local Active Directory (AD) forest, another server running Active Directory Federation Services (AD FS) and Azure AD Connect (AADC), and the third server running MS SQL Server and IIS. The IIS instance hosts a .NET sample federated application published by Microsoft.

In Microsoft Azure I have a single Vnet configured for connectivity to my on-premises lab through a site-to-site IPSec virtual private network (VPN) I’ve setup with pfSense. Within the Vnet exists a single VM running Windows 10 that is domain-joined to the journeyofthegeek.local AD domain. The Azure AD tenant providing the identity backend for the Microsoft Azure subscription is synchronized with the journeyofthegeek.local AD domain using Azure AD Connect and is associated with the domain journeyofthegeek.com. Authentication to the Azure AD tenant is federated using my instance of AD FS. I’m not synchronizing passwords and am using an alternate login ID with the user principal name being synchronized to Azure AD being stored in the AD attribute msDS-CloudExtensionAttribute1. The reason I’m still configured to use an alternate login ID was due to some testing I needed to do for a previous project.

I created a single test user in the journeyofthegeek.local Active Directory domain named Rick Sanchez with a user principal name (UPN) of rick.sanchez@journeyofthegeeklocal and msDS-CloudExtensionAttribute1 of rick.sanchez@journeyofthegeek.com. The only attribute to note that the user has populated is the mail attribute which has the value of rick.sanchez@journeyofthegeek.com. The user is being synchronized to Azure AD via the Azure AD Connect instance.

In AWS I have a single elastic compute cloud (EC2) instance running Windows Server 2016 within a virtual private cloud (VPC). I’ll be configuring Azure AD as an identity provider associated with the AWS account and will be associating an AWS IAM role named AzureADEC2Admins. The role will grant full admin rights over the management of the EC2 instances associated to the account via the AmazonEC2FullAccess permissions policy.

Let’s begin shall we?

The first step I’ll be taking is to log into the Azure Portal as an account that is a member of the global admins and navigate to the Azure Active Directory blade. From there I select Enterprise Applications blade and hit the New Application link.

I then search the application gallery for AWS, select the AWS application, accept the default name, and hit the Add button. Azure AD will proceed to add the application and will then jump to a quick start page. So what exactly does it mean to add an application to Azure AD? Good question, for that we’ll want to use the Azure AD cmdlets. You can reference this link.

Before we jump into running cmdlets, let’s talk very briefly about the concept of application identities in AAD. If you’ve managed Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS), you’re very familiar with the concept of service accounts. When you needed an application (let’s call it a non-human to be more in-line with industry terminology) to access AD-integrated resources directly or on-behalf of a user you would create a security principal to represent the non-human. That security principal could be a user object, managed service account object, or group managed service account object. You would then grant that security principal rights and permissions over the resource or grant it the right to impersonate a user and access the resource on the user’s behalf. The part we want to focus in on is the impersonation or delegation to access a resource on the behalf of a user. In AD DS that delegation is accomplished through the Kerberos protocol.

When we shift over to AAD the same basic concepts still exist of creating a security principal to represent the application and granting that application direct or delegated access to a resource. The difference is the protocol handling the access shifts from Kerberos to OAuth 2.0. One thing many people become confused about is thinking that OAuth handles authentication. It doesn’t. It has nothing do with authentication and everything to do with authorization, or more clearly delegation. When we add an application the AAD a service principal object and sometimes application object (in AWS instance both are created) are created in the AAD tenant to represent the application. I’m going to speak to the service principal object for the AWS integration, but you can read through this link for a good walkthrough on application and service principal objects and how they differ.

Now back to AWS. So we added the application and we now have a service principal object in our tenant representing AWS. Here is a few of the attributes for the object pulled via PowerShell.

Review of the attributes for the object provide a few pieces of interesting information. We’ll get to experiment more with what these mean when we start doing Fiddler captures, but let’s talk a bit about them now. The AppRoles attribute provides a single default role of msiam_access. Later on we’ll be adding additional roles that will map back to our AWS IAM roles.

Next up we have the KeyCredentials which contains two entries. This attribute took me a while to work out. In short, based upon the startDate, I think these two entries are referencing the self-signed certificate included in the IdP metadata that is created after the application is added to the directory. I’ll cover the IdP metadata in the next entry.

The Oauth2Permissions are a bit funky for this use case since we’re not really allowing the application to access AWS on our behalf, but rather asking it to produce a SAML assertion asserting our identity. Maybe the delegation can be thought of as delegating Azure AD the right to create logical security tokens representing our users that can be used to assert an identity to AWS.

The PasswordCredentials contains a single entry which shares the same KeyID as the KeyCredential. As best I can figure from reading the documentation is this would normally contain entries for client keys when not using certificate authentication. Given that it contains a single entry with the same KeyID as the KeyCredential for signing, I can only guess it will contain an entry even with a certificate is used to authenticate the application.

The last attributes of interest are the PreferredTokenSigningKeyThumbprint which references the certificate within the IdP metadata and the replyURLs which is the assertion consumer URI for AWS.

So yeah, that’s what happens in those 2 or 3 seconds the AWS application is registered with Azure AD. I found it interesting how the service principal object is used to represent trust between Azure AD and AWS and all the configuration information attached to the object after the application is simply added. It’s nice to have some of the configuration work done for us out of the box, but there is much more to do.

In the next entry I’ll walk through the Quick Start for the AWS application configuration and explore the metadata Azure AD creates.

The journey continues in my third entry.

Deep dive into AD FS and MS WAP – User Certificate Authentication through a WAP

Posted on August 24, 2017 by mattfeltonma

Hi everyone,

Today I continue my series of posts that cover a behind the scenes look at how Active Directory Federation Service (AD FS) and the Microsoft Web Application Proxy (WAP) interact. In my first post I explained the business cases that would call for the usage of a WAP. In my second post I did a deep dive into the WAP registration process (MS refers to this as the trust establishment with AD FS and the WAP). In this post I decided to cover how user certificate authentication is achieved when AD FS server is placed behind the WAP.

AD FS offers a few different options to authenticate users to the service including Integrated Windows Authentication (IWA), forms-based authentication, and certificate authentication. Readers who work in environments with sensitive data where assurance of a user’s identity is important should be familiar with certificate authentication in the Microsoft world. If you’re unfamiliar with it I recommend you take a read through this Microsoft article.

With the recent release of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Digital Identity Guidelines 800-63 which reworks the authenticator assurance levels (AAL) and relegates passwords to AAL1 only, organizations will be looking for other authenticator options. Given the maturity of authenticators that make use of certificates such as the traditional smart card it’s likely many organizations will look at opportunities for how the existing equipment and infrastructure can be further utilized. So all the more important we understand how AD FS certificate authentication works.

I’ll be using the lab I described in my first post. I made the following modifications/additions to the lab:

Configure Active Directory Certificate Services (AD CS) certificate authority (CA) to include certificate revocation list (CRL) distribution point (CDP). The CRLs will be served up via an IIS instance with the address crl.journeyofthegeek.com. This is the only CDP listed in the certificates. Certificates created during my original lab setup that are installed within the infrastructure do not include a CDP.
Added a non-domain-joined Windows 10 computer which be used as the endpoint the test user accesses the federation service from.

Tool-wise I used ProcMon, Fiddler, API Monitor, and WireShark.

So what did I discover?

Prior to doing any type of user interaction, I setup the tools I would be using moving forward. On the WAP I started ProcMon as an Administrator and configured my filters to capture only TCP Send and TCP Receive operations. I also setup WireShark using a filter of ip.addr==192.168.100.10 && tcp.port==80. The IP address is the IP of the web server hosting my CRLs. This would ensure I’d see the name of the process making the connection to the CDP as well as the conversation between the two nodes.

** Note that the machine will cache the CRLs after they are successfully downloaded from the CDP. It will not make any further calls until the CRLs expire. To get around this behavior while I was testing I ran the command certutil -setreg chain\ChainCacheResyncFiletime @now as outlined in this article. This forces the machine to pull the CRLs again from the CDP regardless of whether or not they are expired. I ran the command as the LOCAL SYSTEM security principal using psexec.

The final step was to start Fiddler as the NETWORK SERVICE security principal using the command psexec -i -u “NT AUTHORITY\Network Service” “C:\Program Files (x86)\Fiddler2\Fiddler.exe”. Remember that Fiddler needs the public key certificate in the appropriate file location as I outlined in my last post. Recall that the Web Application Proxy Service and the Active Directory Federation Service running on the WAP both run as that security principal.

Once all the tools were in place I logged into the non-domain joined Windows 10 box and opened up Microsoft Edge and popped the username of my test user into the username field.

After home realm discovery occurred within Azure AD, I received the forms-based login page of my AD FS instance.

Let’s take a look at what’s happened on the WAP so far.

In the initial HTTP Connect session the WAP makes to the AD FS farm, we see that the ClientHello handshake occurs where the WAP authenticates to the AD FS server to authenticate itself as described in my last post.

Once the secure session is established the WAP passes the HTTP GET request to the AD FS server. It adds a number of headers to the request which AD FS consumes to identify the client is coming from the WAP. This information is used for a number of AD FS features such as enforcing additional authentication policies for Extranet access.

The WAP also passes a number of query strings. There are a few interesting query strings here. The first is the client-request-id which is a unique identifier for the session that AD FS uses to correlate event log errors with the session. The username is obvious and shows the user’s user principal name that was inputted in the username field at the O365 login page. The wa query string shows a value of wsignin1.0 indicating the usage of WS-Federation. The wtrealm indicates the relying party identifier of the application, in this case Azure AD.

The wctx query string is quite interesting and needs to be parsed a bit on its own. Breaking down the value in the parameter we come across three unique parameters.

LoginOptions=3 indicates that the user has not selected the “Keep me signed in” option. If the user had selected that checkbox a value of 1 would have been passed and AD FS would create a persistent cookie which would exist even after the browser closes. This option is sometimes preferable for customers when opening documents from SharePoint Online so the user does not have to authenticate over and over.

The estsredirect contains the encoded and signed authentication request from O365. I stared at API monitor for a few hours going API call by API call trying to identify what this looks like once it’s decoded, but was unsuccessful. If you know how to decode it, I’d love to know. I’m very curious as to its contents.

The WAP next makes another HTTP GET to the AD FS server this time including the additional query string of pullStatus which is set equal to 0. I’m clueless as to the function on of this, I couldn’t find anything. The only other thing that changes is the referer.

My best guess on the above two sessions is the first session is where AD FS performs home realm discovery and maybe some processing on to determine if there are any special configurations for the WAP such as limited or expanded authentication options (device authN, certAuthN only). The second session is simply the AD FS server presenting the authentication methods configured for Extranet users.

The user then chooses the “Sign in with an X.509 certificate” (I’m not using SNI to host both forms and cert authN on the same port) and the WAP then performs another HTTP CONNECT to port 49443 which is the certificate authentication endpoint on the AD FS server. It again authenticates to the AD FS server with its client certificate prior to establishing the secure tunnel.

The third session we see a HTTP POST to the AD FS server with the same query parameters as our previous request but also providing a JSON object with a key of AuthMethod and the key value combination of AuthMethod=CertificateAuthentication in the body.

The next session is another HTTP POST with the same JSON object content and the key value pairs of AuthMethod=CertificateAuthentication and RetrieveCertificate=1 in the body. The AD FS server sends a 307 Temporary Redirect to the /adfs/backendproxytls/ endpoint on the AD FS server.

Prior to the redirect completing successful we see the calls to the CDP endpoint for the full and delta CRLs.

I was curious as to which process was pulling the CRLs and identified it was LSASS.EXE from the ProcMon capture.

At the /adfs/backendproxytls/ endpoint the WAP performs another HTTP POST this time posting a JSON object with a number of key value combinations.

The interesting key value types included in the JSON object are the nested JSON object for Headers which contains all the WAP headers I covered earlier. The query string JSON object which contains all the query strings I covered earlier. The SeralizedClientCertificate contains the certificate the user provided after selecting to use certificate authentication. The AD FS server then sends back a cookie to the WAP. This cookie is the cookie the representing the user’s authentication to the AD FS server as detailed in this link.

The WAP then performs a final HTTP GET back at the /adfs/ls/ endpoint including the previously described headers and query strings as well as provided the cookie it just received. The AD FS server responds by providing the assertion requested by Microsoft along with a MSISAuthenticated, MSISSignOut, and MSISLoopDetectionCookie cookies which are described in the link above.

What did we learn?

The certificate is checked at both the WAP and the AD FS server to ensure it is valid and issued from a trusted certificate authority. Remember to verify you trust the certificate chain of any user certificates on both the AD FS servers and WAPs.
CRL Revocation checking is enabled by default and is performed on both the AD FS server and the WAP. Remember to verify the locations in your CDP are available by both devices.
The AD FS servers use the LSALogonUser function in the secur32.dll library to perform standard certificate authentication to Active Directory Domain Services. I didn’t include this, but I captured this by running API monitor on the AD FS server.

In short, if you’re going to use device authentication or user certificate authentication make sure you have your PKI components in order.

See you next post!

Deep dive into AD FS and MS WAP – WAP Registration

Posted on August 8, 2017 by mattfeltonma

Hi everyone,

In today’s blog entry I’ll be doing a deep dive into how the Microsoft Web Application Proxy (WAP) established a trust with the Active Directory Federation Service (AD FS) (I’ll be referring to this as registration) in order to act as a reverse proxy for AD FS. In my first entry into this series I covered the business use cases that would call for such an integration as well as providing an overview of the lab environment I’ll be using for the series. So what does registration mean? Well, the best way to describe it is to see it in action.

Figuring out how to capture the conversation took some trial and error. This is where Sysinternals Process Explorer comes into play. I went through the process of registering the WAP with AD FS using the Remote Access Management Console configuration utility and monitored the running processes with Process Explorer. Upon reviewing the TCP/IP activity of the Remote Access Management Console process (RAMgmtUI.exe) I observed TCP connectivity to the AD FS farm.

RemoteReg

The process is running as the logged in user, in my case the administrator account I’ve configured. This meant I would need to run Fiddler using the logged in user context rather than having to do some funky with running it as SYSTEM or another security principal using PSEXEC.

I started up Fiddler and configured it to intercept HTTPS traffic as per the configuration below. Ensure that you’ve trusted the Fiddler root certificate so Fiddler can establish a man-in-the-middle (MITM) scenario.

I next ran the Remote Access Management Console and initiated the Web Application Proxy Configuration wizard. Here I ran the wizard a few different times specifying invalid credentials on the AD FS server to generate some web requests. The web conversation below popped up Fiddler.

Digging into the third session shows an HTTP POST to sts.journeyofthegeek.com/adfs/Proxy/EstablishTrust with a return code of 401 Unauthorized which we would expect given our application doesn’t know if authentication is required yet and didn’t specify an Authorization header.

estab1

Session four shows another HTTP POST to the same URL this time with an Authorization header specifying Basic authentication with our credentials Base64 encoded. We receive another 401 because we have invalid credentials which again is expected.

What’s interesting is the JSON object being posted to the URL. The JWT includes a key named SerializedTrustCertificate with a value of a Base64 encoded public-key certificate as the value.

Copy and pasting the encoded value to notepad and saving the file with a CER extension yields the certificate below of which the WAP has both the public and private key pairs. The certificate is a 2048-bit key length self-signed certificate.

At this point the WAP will attempt numerous connections to the /adfs/Proxy/GetConfiguration URL with a query string of api-version=2 as seen in the screenshot below. It will receive a 401 back because Fiddler needs a copy of the client certificate to provide to the AD FS server. At this point I let it time out and eventually the setup finished.

So what does the configuration information look like from AD FS when it’s successfully retrieved? So to see that we have to now pay attention to the Microsoft.IdentityServer.ProxyService.exe process which runs as the Active Directory Federation Services service (adfssrv).

Since the process runs as Network Service I needed to get a bit creative in how I captured the conversation with Fiddler. The first step is to export the public-key certificate for the self-signed certificate generated by the WAP, name it ClientCertificate.cer, and to store it in the Network Service profile folder in C:\Windows\ServiceProfiles\NetworkService\Documents\Fiddler2. By doing this Fiddler will use that certificate for any website requiring client certificate authentication.

The next step was to start Fiddler as the Network Service security principal. To do this I used PSEXEC with the following options:

Psexec -i -u “NT AUTHORITY\Network Service” “C:\Program Files (x86)\Fiddler2\Fiddler.exe.

I then restarted the Active Directory Federation Service on the WAP and boom there are our successful GET from the AD FS server at the /adfs/Proxy/GetConfiguration URL.

The WAP receives back a JSON object with all the configuration information for the AD FS server as seen below. Much of this is information about endpoints the AD FS server is supporting. Beyond that we get information the AD FS service configuration. The WAP uses this configuration to setup its bindings with the HTTP.SYS kernel mode driver. Yes the WAP uses HTTP.SYS in the same way AD FS uses it.

So what did we learn? When establishing the trust with the AD FS server (I’m branding this registration 🙂 ) the WAP does the following:

Generates a 2048-bit self-signed certificate
Opens an HTTPS connection with an AD FS server
Performs a POST on /adfs/Proxy/EstablishTrust providing a JSON object containing the public key certificate and authenticating to the AD FS server with the credentials provided with the wizard using Basic authentication.If the authentication is successful the AD FS server establishes the trust. (I’ll dig into this piece in the next post)
Performs a GET on /adfs/Proxy/GetConfiguration using the self-signed certificate to authenticate itself to the AD FS server.
Consumes the configuration information and configures the appropriate endpoints with calls to HTTP.SYS.

So that’s the WAP side of the fence for establishing the trust. In my next post I’ll briefly cover what goes on with the AD FS server as well as examining the LDAP calls (if any) to AD DS during the registration process.

See you next time!

Journey Of The Geek

The chronicles of a Bostonian tech geek navigating through life and technology

Tag Archives: Microsoft

Integrating Azure AD and AWS – Part 3

Integrating Azure AD and AWS – Part 2