Azure Files and AD DS – Part 1

Azure Files and AD DS – Part 1

Welcome back folks.

I recently had a few customers reach out to me with questions around Azure Files integration with Windows Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS). Since I had never used it, I decided to build a small lab and test the functionality and better understand the service. In this series I’ll be walking through what the functionality provides, how I observed it working, and how to set it up.

In any enterprise you will have a number of Windows file shares hosting critical corporate data. If you’ve ever maintained or supported those file shares you’re quite familiar with the absolute sh*t show that occurs across an organization with the coveted H drive is no longer accessible. Maintaining a large cluster of Windows Servers backing corporate file shares can be significantly complex to support. You have your upgrades, patches, needs to scale, failures with DFS-R (distributed file system replication) or FRS-R (file replication service replication) for some of you more unfortunate souls. Wouldn’t it be wonderful if all that infrastructure could be abstracted and managed by someone else besides you? That is the major value proposition of Azure Files.

Azure Files is a PaaS (platform-as-a-service) offering provided by Microsoft Azure that is built on top of Azure Storage. It provides fully managed file shares over a protocol you know and love, SMB (Server Message Block). You simply create an Azure File share within an Azure Storage account and connect to the file share using SMB from a Windows, Linux, or MacOS machine.

Magic right? Well what about authentication and authorization? How does Microsoft validate that you are who you say you are and that you’re authorized to connect to the file share? That my friends will be what we cover from this point on.

Azure File shares supports methods of authentication:

  1. Storage account access keys
  2. Azure AD Domain Services
  3. AD DS (Active Directory Domain Services)

Of the three methods, I’m going cover authentication using AD DS (which I’ll refer to as Windows AD).

Support for Windows AD with Azure Files graduated to general availability last month. As much as we’d like it to not be true, Windows AD and traditional SMB file shares will be with us many years to come. This is especially true for enterprises taking the hybrid approach to cloud, which is a large majority of the customer base I work with. The Windows AD integration allows organizations to leverage their existing Windows AD identities for authentication and protect the files using Windows ACLs (access control lists) they’ve grown to love. This provides a number of benefits:

  • Single sign-on experience for users (via Kerberos)
  • Existing Windows ACLs can be preserved if moving files to a Azure File share integrated with Windows AD
  • Easier to supplement existing on-premises file servers without affecting the user experience
  • Better support for lift and shift workloads which may have dependencies on SMB
  • No infrastructure to manage
  • Support for Azure File Sync which allows you to store shares in Azure Files and create cache on Windows Servers

There are a few key dependencies and limitations I want to call out. Keep in mind you’ll want to visit the official documentation as these will change over time.

  • The Windows AD identities you want to use to access the file shares must be synchronized to Azure AD (we’ll cover the why later)
  • The storage account hosting the Azure File share must be in the same tenant you’re syncing the identities to
  • Linux VMs are not supported at this time
  • Services using the computer account will not be able to access an Azure File share so plan on using a traditional service account (aka User account) instead
  • Clients accessing the file share must be Window 7/Server 2008 R2 ore above
Lab Environment

So I’ve given you the marketing pitch, let’s take a look at the lab environment I’ll be using for this walkthrough.

For my lab I’ve provisioned three VMs (virtual machines) in a VNet (virtual network). I have a domain controller which provides the jogcloud.local Windows AD forest, an Azure AD Connect server which is synchronizing users to the jogcloud Azure AD tenant, and a member server which I’ll use to access the file share.

In addition to the virtual machines, I also have an Azure Storage account where I’ll create the shares. I’ve also configured a PrivateLink Endpoint which will allow me to access the file share without having to traverse the Internet. Lastly, I have an Azure Private DNS zone hosting the necessary DNS namespace needed to handle resolution to my Private Endpoint. I won’t be covering the inner workings of Azure Private DNS and Private Endpoints, but you can read my series on how those two features work together here.

In my next post I’ll dive in how to setup the integration, walk through some Wireshark and Fiddler captures, and walk through some of the challenges I ran into when running through this lab for this series.

See you next post!

A Comparison – AWS Managed Microsoft AD and Azure Active Directory Domain Services

A Comparison – AWS Managed Microsoft AD and Azure Active Directory Domain Services

Over the past year I’ve done deep dives into both Amazon’s AWS Managed Microsoft Active Directory and Microsoft’s Azure Active Directory Domain Services.  These services represent each vendor’s offering of a managed Windows Active Directory (AD) service.  I extensively covered the benefits of a service over the course of the posts, so today I’m going to cover the key features of each service.  I’m also going to include two tables.  One table will outline the differences in general features while the other outlines the differences in security-related features.

Let’s hit on the key points first.

  • Amazon provides a legacy (Windows AD is legacy folks) managed service while Microsoft provides a modernized service (Azure AD) which has been been integrated with a legacy service.
  • Microsoft synchronizes users, passwords hashes, and groups from the Azure AD to a managed instance of Windows Active Directory.  The reliance on this synchronization means the customer has to be comfortable synchronizing both directory data and password hashes to Azure AD.  Amazon does not require any data be synchronized.
  • Amazon provides the capability to leverage the identities in the managed instance of Windows AD or in a forest that has a trust with the managed instance to be leveraged in managing AWS resources.  In this instance Amazon is taking a legacy service and enabling it for management of the modern cloud management plane.
  • The pricing model for the services differs where Amazon bills on a per domain controller basis while Microsoft bills on the number of objects in the directory.
  • Amazon’s service is eligible to be used in solutions that require PCI DSS Level 1 or HIPAA.
  • Both services use a delegated model where the customer has full control over an OU rather the directory itself.  Highly privileged roles such as Schema Admin, Enterprise Admins, and Domain Admins are maintained by the cloud provider.
  • Both services provide LDAP for legacy applications customers may be trying to lift and shift.  Microsoft limits LDAP to read operations while Amazon supports both read and write operations.
  • Both services support LDAPS.  At this time Amazon requires an instance of Active Directory Certificate Services be deployed to act as a Certificate Authority and provide certificates to the managed domain controllers.
  • Both services do not allow the customer to modify the Default Domain Policy or Default Domain Controller Policies.  This means the customer cannot modify the password or lockout policy applied to the domain.  Amazon provides a method of enforcing custom password and lockout policies through Fine Grained Password Policies.  Additionally, the customer does not have the ability to harden the OS of the domain controllers for either service so it is important to review the vendor documentation.
  • Amazon’s service supports Active Directory forest trusts and external trusts.  Microsoft’s service doesn’t support trusts at this time.

Here is a table showing the comparison of general features:

Features AWS Managed Microsoft AD Azure Active Directory Domain Services
Cost Basis Number of Domain Controllers Number of Directory Objects
Schema Extensions Yes, with limitations No
Trusts Yes, with limitations No
Domain Controller Log Access Security and DNS Server Event Logs No
DNS Management Yes Yes
Snapshots Yes No
Limit of Managed Forests 10 per account 1 per Azure AD tenant
Supports being used on-premises Yes with Direct Connect or VPN No, within VNet only
Scaled By Customer Yes No
Max number of Domain Controller 20 per directory Unknown how service is scaled

Here is a table of security capabilities:

Features AWS Managed Microsoft AD Azure Active Directory Domain Services
Requires Directory Synchronization No Yes, including password
Fine-Grained Password Policies Yes, limited to seven No
Smart Card Authentication Not native, requires RADIUS No
LDAPS Yes, with special requirements Yes, but LDAP operations are limited to read
LDAPS Protocols SSLv3, TLS 1.0, TLS 1.2 TLS 1.0, TLS 1.2
LDAPS Cipher Suites RC4, 3DES, AES128, AES256 RC4, 3DES, AES128, AES256
Kerberos Delegation Account-Based and Resource-Based Resource-Based
Kerberos Encryption RC4, AES128, AES256 RC4, AES128, AES256
NTLM Support NTLMv1, NTLMv2 NTLMv1, NTLMv2

Well folks that sums it up.  As you can see from both of the series as well as this summary post both vendors have taken very different approaches in providing the service.  It will be interesting to see how these offerings evolve over the next few years.  As much as we’d love to see Windows Active Directory go away, it will still be here for years to come.

Until next time my fellow geeks!

AWS Managed Microsoft AD Deep Dive Part 6 – Schema Modifications

AWS Managed Microsoft AD Deep Dive  Part 6 – Schema Modifications

Yes folks, we’re at the six post for the series on AWS Managed Microsoft AD (AWS Managed AD.  I’ve covered a lot of material over the series including an overview, how to setup the service, the directory structure, pre-configured security principals, group policies, and the delegated security model, how to configure LDAPS in the service and the implications of Amazon’s design, and just a few days ago looked at the configuration of the security of the service in regards to protocols and cipher suites.  As per usual, I’d highly suggest you take a read through the prior posts in the series before starting on this one.

Today I’m going to look the capabilities within the AWS Managed AD to handle Active Directory schema modifications.  If you’ve read my series on Microsoft’s Azure Active Directory Domain Services (AAD DS) you know that the service doesn’t support the schema modifications.  This makes Amazon’s service the better offering in an environment where schema modifications to the standard Windows AD schema are a requirement.  However, like many capabilities in a managed Windows Active Directory (Windows AD) service, limitations are introduced when compared to a customer-run Windows Active Directory infrastructure.

If you’ve administered an Active Directory environment in a complex enterprise (managing users, groups, and group policies doesn’t count) you’re familiar with the butterflies that accompany the mention of a schema change.  Modifying the schema of Active Directory is similar to modifying the DNA of a living being.  Sure, you might have wonderful intentions but you may just end up causing the zombie apocalypse.  Modifications typically mean lots of application testing of the schema changes in a lower environment and a well documented and disaster recovery plan (you really don’t want to try to recover from a failed schema change or have to back one out).

Given the above, you can see the logic of why a service provider providing a managed Windows AD service wouldn’t want to allow schema changes.  However, there very legitimate business justifications for expanding the schema (outside your standard AD/Exchange/Skype upgrades) such as applications that need to store additional data about a security principal or having a business process that would be better facilitated with some additional metadata attached to an employee’s AD user account.  This is the market share Amazon is looking to capture.

So how does Amazon provide for this capability in a managed Windows AD forest?  Amazon accomplishes it through a very intelligent method of performing such a critical activity.  It’s accomplished by submitting an LDIF through the AWS Directory Service console.  That’s right folks, you (and probably more so Amazon) doesn’t have to worry about you as the customer having to hold membership in a highly privileged group such as Schema Admins or absolutely butchering a schema change by modifying something you didn’t intend to modify.

Amazon describes three steps to modifying the schema:

  1. Create the LDIF file
  2. Import the LDIF file
  3. Verify the schema extension was successful

Let’s review each of the steps.

In the first step we have to create a LDAP Data Interchange Format (LDIF) file.  Think of the LDIF file as a set of instructions to the directory which in this could would be an add or modify to an object class or attribute.  I’ll be using a sample LDIF file I grabbed from an Oracle knowledge base article.  This schema file will add the attributes of unixUserName, unixGroupName, and unixNameIinfo to the default Active Directory schema.

To complete step one I dumped the contents below into an LDIF file and saved it as schemamod.ldif.

dn: CN=unixUserName, CN=Schema, CN=Configuration, DC=example, DC=com
changetype: add
attributeID: 1.3.6.1.4.1.42.2.27.5.1.60
attributeSyntax: 2.5.5.3
isSingleValued: TRUE
searchFlags: 1
lDAPDisplayName: unixUserName
adminDescription: This attribute contains the object's UNIX username
objectClass: attributeSchema
oMSyntax: 27

dn: CN=unixGroupName, CN=Schema, CN=Configuration, DC=example, DC=com
changetype: add
attributeID: 1.3.6.1.4.1.42.2.27.5.1.61
attributeSyntax: 2.5.5.3
isSingleValued: TRUE
searchFlags: 1
lDAPDisplayName: unixGroupName
adminDescription: This attribute contains the object's UNIX groupname
objectClass: attributeSchema
oMSyntax: 27

dn:
changetype: modify
add: schemaUpdateNow
schemaUpdateNow: 1
-

dn: CN=unixNameInfo, CN=Schema, CN=Configuration, DC=example, DC=com
changetype: add
governsID: 1.3.6.1.4.1.42.2.27.5.2.15
lDAPDisplayName: unixNameInfo
adminDescription: Auxiliary class to store UNIX name info in AD
mayContain: unixUserName
mayContain: unixGroupName
objectClass: classSchema
objectClassCategory: 3
subClassOf: top

For the step two I logged into the AWS Management Console and navigated to the Directory Service Console.  Here we can see my instance AWS Managed AD with the domain name of geekintheweeds.com.

6awsadds1.png

I then clicked hyperlink on my Directory ID which takes me into the console for the geekintheweeds.com instance.  Scrolling down shows a menu where a number of operations can be performed.  For the purposes of this blog post, we’re going to focus on the Maintenance menu item.  Here we the ability to leverage AWS Simple Notification Service (AWS SNS) to create notifications for directory changes such as health changes where a managed Domain Controller goes down.  The second section is a pretty neat feature where we can snapshot the Windows AD environment to create a point-in-time copy of the directory we can restore.  We’ll see this in action in a few minutes.  Lastly, we have the schema extensions section.

6awsadds2.png

Here I clicked the Upload and update schema button and entered selected the LDIF file and added a short description.  I then clicked the Update Schema button.

6awsadds3.png

If you know me you know I love to try to break stuff.  If you look closely at the LDIF contents I pasted above you’ll notice I didn’t update the file with my domain name.  Here the error in the LDIF has been detected and the schema modification was cancelled.

6awsadds4.png

I went through made the necessary modifications to the file and tried again.  The LDIF processes through and the console updates to show the schema change has been initialized.

6awsadds5.png

Hitting refresh on the browser window updates the status to show Creating Snapshot.  Yes folks Amazon has baked into the schema update process a snapshot of the directory provide a fallback mechanism in the event of your zombie apocalypse.  The snapshot creation process will take a while.

6awsadds6.png

While the snapshot process, let’s discuss what Amazon is doing behind the scenes to process the LDIF file.  We first saw that it performs some light validation on the LDIF file, it then takes a snapshot of the directory, then applies to the changes to a single domain controller by selecting one as the schema master, removing it from directory replication, and applying the LDIF file using the our favorite old school tool LDIFDE.EXE.  Lastly, the domain controller is added back into replication to replicate the changes to the other domain controller and complete the changes.  If you’ve been administering Windows AD you’ll know this has appeared recommended best practices for schema updates over the years.

Once the process is complete the console updates to show completion of the schema installation and the creation of the snapshot.

6awsadds7.png

 

AWS Managed Microsoft AD Deep Dive Part 5 – Security

AWS Managed Microsoft AD Deep Dive  Part 5 – Security

You didn’t think I was done with AWS Managed Microsoft AD yet did you?  In this post I’m going to perform some tests to evaluate the protocols and ciphers suites available for LDAPS as well as checking out the managed Domain Controllers support for NTLMv1 and the cipher suites supported for Kerberos.  I’ll be using the same testing mechanisms I used when for my series on Microsoft Azure Active Directory Domain Services.

For those of you who are new to the series, I’ve been performing a deep dive review of AWS Managed Microsoft AD which is Amazon’s answer to a managed Windows Active Directory service.  In the first post I provided a high level overview of the service, in the second post I covered the setup of the service, the third post reviewed the directory structure, pre-configured security principals and group policies, and the delegated security model, and in the fourth entry I delved into how Amazon has managed to delegate configuration of LDAPS and the requirements that pop up due to their design choices.  I highly recommend you review those posts as well as my series on Microsoft Azure AD Domain Services if you’d like to compare the two services.

I’ve made a modification to my lab and have added another server named SERVER02 which will be running Linux.  The updated Visio looks like this.

labpart5

Server01 has been configured with the Windows Remote Server Administration Tools (RSAT) for Active Directory as well as holding the Active Directory Certificate Services (AD CS) role and being configured as a root Enterprise CA.  I’ve also done all the necessary configuration to distribute the certificates to the managed domain controllers and have successfully tested LDAPS.  Server02 will be used to test SSLv3 and NTLM.  I’ve modified the instance to use the domain controllers as DNS servers by overriding DHCP settings as outlined in this article.

The first thing I’m going to do is test to see if SSLv3 has been disabled on the managed domain controllers.  Recall that the managed Domain Controllers are running Windows Server 2012 R2 which has SSLv3 enabled by default.  It can be disabled by modifying the registry as documented here.  Believe it or not you can connect to the managed domain controllers registry via a remote registry connection.  Checking the registry location shows that the SSLv3 node hasn’t been created which is indicative of SSLv3 still being enabled.

5awsadds1.png

To be sure I checked it using the same method that I used in my Azure AD Domain Services post which is essentially compiling another version of openssh that supports SSLv3.  After the customized version was installed and I queried the Domain Controller over port 636 which you can see in the screenshot below that SSLv3 is still enabled.  Suffice to say this surprised me considering what I had seen so far in regards to the security of the service.  This will be a show stopper for some organizations in adopting the service especially since it isn’t configurable by the customer that I observed.

5awsadds2.png

So SSLv3 is enabled and presents a risk.  Have the cipher suites been hardened?  For this I’ll again use a tool developed by Thomas Pornin.   The options I’m using perform an exhaustive search across the typically offered cipher suites, space the connections out by 1 second, and start with a minimum of sslv3.

5awsadds3.png

The results are what I expected and mimic the results I saw when testing Azure AD Domain Services, minus the support for SSLv3 which Microsoft has disabled in their managed offering.  The supported cipher suites look to be the out of the box defaults for Server 2012 R2 and include RC4 and 3DES which are ciphers with known vulnerabilities.  The inability to disallow the ciphers might again be a show stopper for organizations with strict security requirements.

The Kerberos protocol is a critical component of Windows Active Directory providing the glue to hold the service together including (but in no way exhaustive) being behind the users authentication to a domain-joined machine, the single sign-on experience, and the ability to form trusts with other forests.  Given the importance of the protocol, it’s important to ensure its backed by strong ciphers.  The ciphers supported by a Windows Active Directory are configurable and can be checked by looking at the msDS-SupportedEncryptionTypes attribute of a domain controller object.

I next pulled up a domain controller object in ADUC and reviewed the attribute.  The attribute on the managed domain controllers has a value of 28, which is the default for Windows Server 2012 R2.  The value translates to support of the following cipher suites:

  • RC4_HMAC_MD5
  • AES128_CTS_HMAC_SHA1
  • AES256_CTS_HMAC_SHA1_96

These are the same cipher suites supported by Microsoft’s Azure AD Domain Services service.  In this case both vendors have left the configuration to the defaults.

Lastly, to emulate my testing Azure AD Domain Services, I tested support for NTLMv1.  By default Windows Server 2012 R2 supports NTLMv1 due to requirements for backwards compatibility. Microsoft has long recommended disabling NTLMv1 due to the documented issues with the security of the protocol. Sadly there are a large number of applications and devices in use in enterprises which still require NTLMv1.

To test the AWS managed domain controllers I’m going to use Samba’s smbclient package on SERVER02.  I’ll use the client to connect to the domain controller’s share from SERVER02 using NTLM.  I first installed the smbclient package by running:

yum install samba-client.

The client enforces the use NTLMV2 in smbclient by default so I needed to make some modifications to the global section of the smb.conf file by adding client ntlmv2 auth = no. This option disables NTLMv2 on smbclient and will force it to use NTLMv1.

5awsadds4.png

In order to see whether or not the client was using NTLMv1 when connecting to the domain controllers, I started a packet capture using tcpdump before initiating a connection with the smbclient.

5awsadds6.png

I then transferred the packet capture over to my Windows box with WinSCP, opened the capture with WireShark, and navigated to the packet containing the Session Setup Request.  In the parsed capture we don’t see an NTLMv2 Response which means NTLMv1 was used to authenticate to the domain controller indicating NTLMv1 is supported by the managed domain controllers.

 

5awsadds5

 

So what can we take from the findings of this analysis?

  1. Amazon has left the secure transport protocols to the defaults which means SSLv3 is supported.
  2. Amazon has left the cipher suites to the defaults which means both RC4 and 3DES cipher suites are supported for both LDAPS and Kerberos.

I’d really like to see Amazon address the support for SSLv3 as soon as possible.  There is no reason I can see why that shouldn’t be shut off by default.  Similar to my requests to Microsoft, I’d like to see Amazon allow the supported cipher suites to be configurable via the AWS Management Console.  These two changes would save organizations with strict security requirements, such as those in the public sector, to utilize the services without introducing significant risk (and audit headaches).

In my next post I’ll demonstrate how the service can be leveraged to provide Windows Active Directory service to on-premises machines or machines in another public cloud as well as exploring how to create a forest trust with the service.

See you next post!